The name and rule of deduce to reduce stress: 03

Benzodiazepines are quick acting and also people can offer speedy relief from the unpleasant feeling of having stress. This gives sufficient support to some people as encouraging them and seeking more permanent solutions to their problems.

There are three unsolved issues of using the benzodiazepines as reducing stress. One is that the drug therapy does not treat the cause of stress, but only the symptoms are treated. This has been argued for a long time. It is only that their effects are being ‘masked’ not treated by the drug. Severely, the drug therapy does not really treat stress. Things which people are causing by stress will be a long term solution for them. Second is that people could have tranquilizing effect. It is that decelerating of physical movements and mental alertness which is that it could affect the normal day-to-day activities. Indeed, this effect would be much worse with alcohol. It could make people as putting them at risk as their driving skills might be affected. The last issue is that prolonged using of benzodiazepines could cause tolerance and addiction. Tolerance is that to earn same effects people will need larger and larger amount of the medication. Addiction is that stopping them could causes withdrawal symptoms and frequently it’s going to be worse from the first time of medication.

The name and rule of deduce to reduce stress: 02

The working and effects of the benzodiazepines are mainly three. One is declining of tension as keeping people calm. Second is lessening of nervousness which people have during when they are feeling stress. Last is overall calming effect as including the effects and working of one and second. These can be used for two types of feeling stress. One is sudden severe stress which could happen anytime. The other stress is general tension. By affecting the levels of naturally occurring brain chemicals the benzodiazepines will work. These brain chemicals are called neurotransmitters. Particularly, the benzodiazepines increase the levels of neurotransmitters which are called GABA. It mainly has two effects on the brain. There are quieting of down activity and the other effect is that it decreases the activity of serotonin. The serotonin is other neurotransmitters. From these effects, for the result, physiological arousal is reduced and people would feel calmer as making them calmer from the declining of anxious.

The name and rule of deduce to reduce stress:01

The names of drag which reduce stress are the benzodiazepines. It is widely used nowadays as anxiolytic drugs that prescribed. Anxiolytic means that they reduce the physical feelings of anxiety. There is one more drag to reduce stress and some doctors use this. It is beta-blockers. To reduce stress, there are many sorts of ways to do it and one of ways is to self-medicate. It works by taking illegal or a recreational drug which is kind of alcohol and it is same as drug. People use it to combat stress. Taking drugs which is prescribed by doctor is the most common way of emotion-focused therapy.

Systematic desensitization

 Systematic Desensitization: This is a form of treatment or therapy for phobias, fears, and aversions that people have. The premise is to reduce a person's anxiety responses through counterconditioning - a person who learned to be afraid of something is associating fear with that object or behavior, and the way to eliminate this is to teach the person to replace the feelings of anxiety with feelings of relaxation when the object or behavior is present. This approach is based on conditioning relaxation with the feared object or object of anxiety.

Social support

  When we are having stress, our friends and family can help us as discussing the problem which you are experiencing stress, to cope the stress. This helps us healing the stress more successfully than solving the stress by ourselves. To avoid the stress or to make better deal for us, in the situation of, if we could identify that what might cause the stress as if we could find out that what trigger the stress; it is more likely situation to avoid it.
 Examination is a good example to proof this. It can cause a great deal of stress. Student can cause this, because they do not have much experience for the emotional impact of the important examination, so they are not well prepared for that kind of impact. Furthermore, learning techniques to deal with stress, which caused by examination could be useful for them. Other thing that they could do is prepare well for the examination. These dealing as problem-focused methods are useful for healing stress in these cases and engaging in a form of training is also useful. In this way, people could be better practiced and better able to cope with it, when stress comes along.
 In 1984 Kiecolt Glaser et al found that students who had more social support suffered less reduction of their immune responses prior to university examinations however, we need to consider definitions of social support.

Anticipatory coping

Lazarus and Folkman (1984) suggested that there are two coping strategies that people use to deal with stress. There are emotion-focused and problem-focused methods of coping. Another known as 'Anticipatory Coping' this method is stress and anxiety come with certain symptoms which might include physical responses, like a tightening of the stomach or shortness of breath. For example, if we anticipate a change, or we have sensitivity to dealing with crowds, then we might change our plan to avoid crowds. Because of this our stress levels will not increase. So, to improve our anticipation we need to gain information about what makes us stressed and developed a plan of action to help us deal with it once we have successfully anticipated it.

Ethical concerts associated with research into obedience

Other criticisms of Milgram's research and other research into obedience focus on ethical concern. These include:

- Causing distress

- Deceiving participant

- A lack of informed consent

- Participants not being given the opportunity to withdraw from the study.

Milgram responded to these criticisms by arguing that:

- The distress was not anticipated and there was no long-term harm

- The deception was necessary and the means justified the ends

- Informed consent was replace by presumptive consent

- Debriefing took place

 Both Milgram and Aronson argued that people made ethical objection because of the actual (distasteful) finding, not because of the methods used.